长白学刊

作为一门新兴学科，纪检监察学自主知识体系的建构面临知识生产碎片化与共识基础薄弱等困境。本研究将“共识”本身作为分析对象引入纪检监察学自主知识体系的讨论，区分出表态性共识、基础性共识、方法性共识与学科性承诺四种共识类型，厘清四者以基础性共识为枢纽的衍生关系，并指出当前学界的共识积累总体处于由表态性共识向基础性共识过渡的阶段。在此基础上，将基础性共识的核心命题凝练为：纪检监察制度是中国共产党基于自我革命的内在驱动、通过党的统一领导所组织和实施的权力监督体系，并依循构成性、操作性与跨学科整合三项标准对其加以论证，进而就延展命题的推导路径、方法性共识的培育方向与学科性承诺的要求展开讨论，以期为纪检监察学从交叉探索走向学科自立提供一条可行进路。

As an emerging discipline, the establishment of an independent knowledge system for discipline inspection and supervision encounters challenges such as fragmented knowledge production and a fragile consensus foundation. This article introduces “consensus” itself as an object of analysis into the discussion of the independent knowledge system of discipline inspection and supervision. It distinguishes four types of consensus, consisting of the declarative consensus, the foundational consensus, the methodological consensus, and the disciplinary commitment. It elucidates the derivative relationships among these four types, with foundational consensus serving as the pivotal link, and highlights that the current accumulation of consensus within academic circles is predominantly in a transitional phase, shifting from declarative consensus to foundational consensus. Based on this, the article refines the core proposition of the foundational consensus as follows: the discipline inspection and supervision system represents a power oversight mechanism organized and executed by the Communist Party of China, propelled by the internal impetus of self-reform and functioning under the Party's unified leadership. Subsequently, the article substantiates this proposition through three criteria: the constitutive, the operational, and cross-disciplinary integration. Building upon this foundation, the article delves into the derivation pathway of extended propositions, the direction for fostering methodological consensus, and the prerequisites for disciplinary commitment, with the objective of offering a viable pathway for discipline inspection and supervision to transition from interdisciplinary exploration to disciplinary autonomy.