166 | 0 | 215 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
调研发现,广西河池市东兰县东里村自2017年创建“协商议事工作室”,协商民主实践初见成效,但传统村民组织历经多次调整后,乡土共同体意识的流散,壮、汉、瑶分族聚居后的空间固化,村落“治权”系统中党员数量偏低,村民个体政治参与差异化等问题,仍是多民族居住村落政治民主化的结构性障碍。因此,亟须深入开展党建工作,重塑族群及现代个体的主体性,增强村民的政治意识和组织归属感;实施有效的空间治理,重建民族互嵌型居住空间关系和跨屯峒民族融合组织,促进不同民族之间的互动和融合;调整红色文化再生产策略,整合多民族各自保留的革命记忆,增强文化认同,推动文化的多元共生。这些问题及举措共同彰显出我国村落协商民主良性实践的一般进程——主体(参与建构村落共同体的不同族群具有独特的传统、语言和社会组织)、空间(村落中多民族处于共同的物理空间和社会结构为民主实践创造独特的环境)、文化(族群共享和独有的历史记忆在塑造身份、治理社区等方面发挥重要作用)的三维共振。
Abstract:Through investigation and research, it has been found that Dongli vllage in Donglan country Hechi city, Guangxi has achieved initial results in the practice of consultative democracy since the establishment of the“Consultative and Deliberation Studio”in 2017. However, after several adjustments to traditional village organizations, several structural obstacles to the political democratization of multi-ethnic residential villages still exist. These include the dispersion of the local community consciousness, spatial solidification after the settlement divisions between the Zhuang, Han and Yao ethnic groups, a low percentage of Party members in the village“governance”system, and differentiated political participation among villagers. Therefore, it is urgent to deepen the Party building work, reshape the subjectivity of ethnic groups and modern individuals, and enhance the political consciousness and sense of organizational belonging of villagers. It is urgent to implement effective spatial governance, rebuild ethnic interlocking residential spatial relationships and cross tundong ethnic integration organizations, and promote interaction and integration between different ethnic groups. It is urgent to adjust the strategy of reproducing red culture, integrate the revolutionary memories retained by multiple ethnic groups, enhance cultural identity, and promote the coexistence of diverse cultures. These issues and measures collectively exemplify the general process of healthy consultative democratic practices in Chinese villages, which involve three dimensions of resonance: subject(different ethnic groups involved in building the village community have unique traditions, languages, and social organizations), space(the physical space and social structure of multi-ethnic villages creates a unique environment for democratic practice), and culture(shared and unique historical memories of ethnic groups play a significant role in shaping identity and governing the community).
[1]何包钢,王春光.中国乡村协商民主——个案研究[J].社会学研究,2007(3):56-73.
[2]陈剩勇,吴兴智.公民参与与地方公共政策的制定——以浙江省温岭市民主恳谈会为例[J].学术界,2007(5):30-39.
[3]郎友兴.中国式的公民会议——浙江温岭民主恳谈会的过程和功能[J].公共行政评论,2009(2):48-70.
[4]范逢春,袁玲.国内基层协商民主研究的热点主题与演进趋势——基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析[J].理论月刊,2022(10):27-40.
[5]杜何琪.从工具到机制:农村协商民主的生长过程与局限——来自苏南某村庄的案例[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(4):84-92.
[6]董红,王有强.农村基层协商民主的困境与对策[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(2):57-63.
[7]刘彦昌,孙琼欢.治理现代化视角下的协商民主[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2017:15.
[8]董国菊.边疆民族地区农村基层协商民主建设的实践路径探索——基于对德宏州芒市典型村寨的调研[J].云南社会主义学院学报,2019(2):77-86.
[9]中国科学院民族研究所广西少数民族社会历史调查组.东兰县中和人民公社东里屯社会历史调查报告[R].1964:23.
[10]中共广西区委党史资料征集委员会.左右江革命根据地[M].北京:中共党史资料出版社,1989:63.
[11]张大维,赵益晨.引领式协商:协商系统理论下党领导自治的新发展——以广西宜州木寨村为例[J].湖湘论坛,2021(5):47-62.
[12]李晓广.论协商治理视域下村民小组自治的有效实现[J].学术界,2019(4):38-46.
[13]白启鹏.新时代提升农村社区协商治理效能的探索与思考[J].内蒙古社会科学,2022(1):34-40.
[14]李增元.农村基层治理单元的历史变迁及当代选择[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018(2):31-42.
[15]陈明.村民自治——“单元下沉”抑或“单元上移”[J].探索与争鸣,2014(12):107-110.
[16]刘鹏翔.西南边疆少数民族历史书写中的国家认同意识——基于哈尼族的讨论[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023(2):44-50.
[17]李晓斌,王燕.历史书写与边疆少数民族国家意识的形成——以云南佤族为例[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(6):17-24.
(1)后来有1位侗族女性嫁入该村。
(1)1989年组建行政村以前的村落数据中目前仅存1959年的。
(1)调研中查阅其会议记录,发现都没有会议过程的具体记录,大多只有签到表和最终决策文件,且历次文件内容雷同。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19649/j.cnki.cn22-1009/d.2025.01.004
中图分类号:D633;D422.6;G249.27
引用信息:
[1]杨天保,刘蓉.族群·屯峒·记忆——多民族居住村落协商民主实践的三要素[J].长白学刊,2025,No.241(01):31-41.DOI:10.19649/j.cnki.cn22-1009/d.2025.01.004.
基金信息:
全国教育科学规划单位资助教育部规划课题“社会治理视域下民族地区传统德育方法论研究”(FEB180518)